Vet Blog Home

< Previous If Your Dog Breaks Into Your Stash . . . Redux What Are the Treatments for Tick Paralysis? Next >
05/09/09

New Technology May Help Surgeons Remove Tumors From Pets and People
Dr. Eric Barchas, DVM

scalpel

The April 25, 2009 Economist’s science and technology section contained an article that discussed a promising technique to aid in treating cancers in all species.

A DIAGNOSIS of cancer is often followed by a prescription of surgery. Before chemotherapy, before radiation, the knife is frequently the oncologist’s first line of attack. If done early and well, it has the potential to stop the disease in its tracks. Even if it does not, it is the best way for the doctor to get a feel for what he is dealing with, how extensive it is, and what to do next. But, whereas therapies and diagnostics for cancer have been evolving steadily in response to new biochemical knowledge, surgical techniques have remained surprisingly primitive.

What happens at the moment is that a surgeon roots around inside a patient, removes as much tumour as he can find, and hopes he got it all. He then sends what he has excised to a laboratory, where pathologists sample all around the outside of the extracted mass to see if it is encapsulated by healthy tissue. If it is, the whole tumour has probably been removed. If not, the surgeon must go back in, and the time-consuming process starts again.

Roger Tsien and his colleagues at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD), are trying to halt this cycle by creating a luminous map for the surgeon to follow. Dr Tsien, who shared the 2008 Nobel prize in chemistry for his work on green fluorescent protein, has found a way to make cancer cells glow. That could help surgeons see precisely what to cut out and what to leave behind.

Tumor removal surgery definitely can be harrowing business. The mainstay of tumor excision is obtaining “wide margins”. This means that the capsule of healthy tissue surrounding the tumor should be as large as possible. But tumor tissue can only be definitively diffentiated from normal tissue when it is examined under a microscope.

The technique detailed in the Economist will do nothing to address the need for microscopic evaluation to definitively determine tumor margins. However, it definitely is a step in the right direction.

Share this entry with your pawple anywhere:

See related Vet Blog entries:

There are 2 Comments

  1. Benjamin's Mom posted a comment on May 9th, 2009 at 7:18 pm

    Thanks for this informative article. My Golden male,Benjamin, recently had a nerve sheath tumor, which was exicised as widely as possible from his left elbow, It was a difficult area to heal and after a month it’s starting to look much better. Now, I have concerns about tumors coming back and he is limping on his hind left leg.. He’s 8 years old and a real sweetheart. I’m doing my best to spoil him. I’d like to hear from other Golden parents whose dogs have done well after such a surgery. Thanks! Benjamin’s mom

  2. Charli posted a comment on May 10th, 2009 at 9:18 am

    This is great news. Personally, I’ve had two different skin cancers removed from my face. In each case, they had to do a MOHS procedure to map out the area, check the margins and see if they got everything the first time. Luckily, they did but that does mean that some healthy tissue was lost, too. If something like this would work on anyone..canine or human…it would certainly help reduce the removal of healthy tissue.

Leave Your Comment Now

fields marked with * are required

These HMTL tags are allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> <img src="" alt="" title="" height="" width="">



< Previous If Your Dog Breaks Into Your Stash . . . Redux What Are the Treatments for Tick Paralysis? Next >