
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where do Vaccine-Associated Tumors Develop in Cats?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.dogster.com/vet_blog_information_advice/where-do-vaccine-associated-tumors-develop-in-cats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.dogster.com/vet_blog_information_advice/where-do-vaccine-associated-tumors-develop-in-cats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:25:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.dogster.com/vet_blog_information_advice/where-do-vaccine-associated-tumors-develop-in-cats/comment-page-1/#comment-5731</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.dogster.com/vet_blog_information_advice/?p=1233#comment-5731</guid>
		<description>3rd year veterinary student here. 

To be fair, the question &quot;Can you provide quantitative evidence that three-year vaccines are three times more likely to cause cancer as your one-year, non-adjuvanted vaccine?&quot; is awfully specific. 

If they had quantitative evidence only showed that it was once or twice as likely she would have to answer &quot;no&quot; to your question. 

Shouldn&#039;t the real question be whether vaccination-site associated tumors are more or less likely in animals getting one vaccine versus another?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3rd year veterinary student here. </p>
<p>To be fair, the question &#8220;Can you provide quantitative evidence that three-year vaccines are three times more likely to cause cancer as your one-year, non-adjuvanted vaccine?&#8221; is awfully specific. </p>
<p>If they had quantitative evidence only showed that it was once or twice as likely she would have to answer &#8220;no&#8221; to your question. </p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t the real question be whether vaccination-site associated tumors are more or less likely in animals getting one vaccine versus another?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
